ADMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE IN THE SHARIAH COURTS OF MALAYSIA: LEGAL FRAMEWORK, JUDICIAL APPLICATION AND CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22452/Keywords:
Evidence, Electronic Documents, Al-Kitābah, Syariah Courts, Syariah Court Evidence EnactmentAbstract
The advancement of digital technology has significantly reshaped evidentiary practices within Malaysia’s judicial system, including the Shariah Courts. Electronic documents now function as an important mode of proof alongside traditional written instruments. Despite statutory recognition of electronic documents in the Shariah Courts, significant legal and procedural uncertainties remain concerning authentication, evidential reliability, and digital integrity. This article analyses the application of electronic documents as evidence in the Shariah Courts from both Islamic jurisprudential and Malaysian statutory perspectives. It examines the doctrinal foundation of documentary proof under the concept of al-kitābah and situates electronic documents within the broader evidentiary framework of al-bayyinah. A comparative analysis is conducted between the Evidence Act 1950 and the Shariah Court Evidence Enactments. The analysis evaluates the differences in definitional scope, admissibility mechanisms, and procedural safeguards governing electronic documentary evidence. Selected Shariah Court cases are also analysed to assess judicial approaches in determining authenticity, chain of custody, and the necessity of digital forensic verification. The study adopts a qualitative doctrinal methodology based on statutory provisions, fiqh literature, and reported cases, employing content and comparative analysis to identify regulatory strengths and gaps. The findings indicate that while Malaysian Shariah law has formally incorporated electronic documents as primary evidence, its procedural framework remains less structured compared to the civil law regime. Challenges relating to digital manipulation risks, absence of standardised procedures, and inconsistent evidentiary practices highlight the need for legislative refinement and institutional capacity-building. The article concludes that the admissibility of electronic documents is consistent with Islamic evidentiary principles, provided that authenticity, reliability, and integrity are properly established. Strengthening statutory clarity and procedural standards is essential to ensure coherent digital proof management in the Shariah Courts.
References
Alias, M. A. A., Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., & Mallow, M. S. (2024). Wasa’il Ithbat dalam Undang-Undang Keterangan Islam: Analisis Perundangan terhadap Kebolehterimaan Dokumen Elektronik di Mahkamah Syariah Malaysia: Means of Proof in Islamic Law of Evidence: A Legal Analysis of the Admissibility of Electronic Documents in Malaysian Shariah Courts. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, vol. 12, no. 3, 689–700.
Alias, M. A. A., Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., Hashim, H., & Mallow, M. S. (2025). An Appraisal of the Legal Framework Governing the Admissibility of Electronic Documents as Evidence in Malaysian Shariah Courts: Current Practices and Future Legal Directions. IIUM Law Journal, vol. 33, no. 2, 69–108.
Al-Fayrūzābādī. (1987). Al-Qāmūs al-Muḥīṭ. Muʾassasah al-Risālah.
Ḥusām ʿAffānah. (2010). Fatāwā Ḥusām ʿAffānah. Maktabah Dandīs.
Ibn Farḥūn. (1958). Tabṣirah al-Ḥukkām. Maṭbaʿah Muṣṭafā al-Ḥalabī.
Ibn Manẓūr. (2000). Lisān al-ʿArab. Dār Ṣādir.
Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah. (1989). Al-Ṭuruq al-Ḥukmiyyah. Maktabah Dār al-Bayān.
Ibn Taymiyyah. (1985). Mukhtaṣar al-Fatāwā al-Miṣriyyah. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.
Al-Jurjānī, ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad al-Sayyid al-Sharīf. (2000). Al-Taʿrīfāt. Maktabah Lubnān.
Al-Marāghī. (1974). Tafsīr al-Marāghī. Dār al-Fikr.
Mohd Shariff, A. A., Yahya, M. A., Rajamanickam, R., Hsu Tzu-Hsin, M., Mohd Subki, M. M., Azahari, N. F., Raja, J., & Muhamad, S. S. (2022). Prinsip Rantaian Jagaan dan Rantaian Keterangan: Keperluan kepada Pengiktirafan dan Pengaplikasian dalam Perbicaraan Kes Syariah di Malaysia: Principles of Chain of Custody and Chain of Evidence: The Need for Recognition and Application in Malaysian Syariah Case. Journal of Muwafaqat, vol. 5, no. 1, 17–32.
Muḥammad Aḥmad al-ʿUmr. (1993). Al-Tawthīq bi al-Kitābah fī al-Sharīʿah al-Islāmiyyah. Master’s Dissertation, Universiti Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Al-Qalqashandī. (1987). Ṣubḥ al-Aʿshā fī Ṣināʿat al-Inshāʾ. Edited by Yūsuf ʿAlī Ṭawīl. Dār al-Fikr.
Rajamanickam, R., Noh, N. I. M., & Harun, A. (2022). Kebolehterimaan Keterangan Elektronik di Malaysia (Admissibility of Electronic Evidence in Malaysia). Jurnal Undang-Undang dan Masyarakat, vol. 31, no. 1, 111–125.
Rinhat Dozy. (2000). Takmilat al-Maʿājim al-ʿArabiyyah. Wizārat al-Thaqāfah wa al-Iʿlām.
Saʿdi, M. M., & Kamarudin, A. R. (2020). The Authenticity of Electronic Document in Islamic Law and Malaysian Law of Evidence. Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Penyelidikan Pengurusan Hal Ehwal Islam di Malaysia.
Saʿīd al-Sayyid Qandīl. (2004). Al-Tawqīʿ al-Elektrūnī: Māhiyyatuhu wa Ṣūrat Ḥujjiyyatihi fī al-Ithbāt bayna al-Tadwīl wa al-Iqtibās. Dār al-Jāmiʿah al-Jadīdah li al-Nashr.
Saifuddin, S. (2021). Analisis Pemakaian Darjah Pembuktian bagi Kesalahan Hudud di Bawah Enakmen Jenayah Syariah di Malaysia. Journal of Shariah Law Research, vol. 6, no. 1, 89–108.
Saifuddin, S., & Ali Tajuddin, H. H. (2024). Application Shifting the Burden of Proof in Syariah Criminal Cases Under the Syariah Court Evidence Enactment in Malaysia. Journal of Shariah Law Research, vol. 9, no. 1, 27–46.
Saifuddin, S., Ali Tajuddin, H. H., Mohd Arif, M. I. A., Abdul Rahim Ali al-Maslmawi, F., & Sefriani. (2025). The Challenges of Enforcement for Syariah Criminal Offences Pertaining to Aqidah on Social Media. ISLĀMIYYĀT, vol. 47, no. 1, 194–204.
Saifuddin, S., Ali Tajuddin, H. H., Yahya, M. A., Abd Rahman, M. R., & Hashim, F. Y. (2024). Examining the Application of Standard of Proof in Criminal Cases: A Comparative Analysis of Islamic Law and Common Law in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, vol. 12, no. 1, 11–22.
Saifuddin, S., Hashim, F. Y., Mohd Zahir, M. Z., & Ab Halim, A. H. (2025). Enforcement of Sharia Criminal Offences in Cyberspace: Challenges from Malaysian Legal Perspective. Prophetic Law Review, vol. 7, no. 1, 25–46.
Al-Shawkānī. (2002). Al-Fatḥ al-Rabbānī min Fatāwā al-Imām al-Shawkānī. Maktabat al-Jīl al-Jadīd.
Shawqī Riyāḍ Ibrāhīm. (1970). Naẓariyyat al-Ithbāt fī al-Murāfaʿāt. Dār Nahḍah al-ʿArabiyyah.
Sobri, I. S. (2009). Al-Yamīn fī al-Qaḍāʾ al-Islāmī. Dār al-Nafāʾis.
Al-Subayʿī. (2014). Al-Masāʾil al-Fiqhiyyah al-Mustajaddah fī al-Nikāḥ maʿa Bayān mā Ukhidha bihi al-Qānūn al-Kuwaytī. Majallat al-Waʿy al-Islāmī.
Wan Ismail, W. A. F. (2016). Penerimaan dan Kekuatan Dokumen Elektronik dalam Pembuktian di Mahkamah Syariah di Malaysia. Kanun, vol. 28, no. 2, 338–355.
Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., Abdul Mutalib, L., Kahar, N. S. A., & Alias, M. A. A. (2023). Keperluan Prosedur Operasi Standard dalam Penerimaan Dokumen Digital di Mahkamah Sivil Malaysia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 14, no. 1, 372–393.
Yahya, M. A. (2020). Pengemukakan Dokumen Elektronik sebagai Keterangan dalam Perbicaraan Mahkamah Syariah. Jurnal Undang-Undang dan Masyarakat, vol. 27, 55–63.
List of Statutes
Evidence Act 1950 [Act 56].
Shariah Court Evidence Enactment (Selangor State) 2003.
List of Cases
Hisham Halim v Maya Ahmad Fuaad, [2018] SHRU 15.
Pendakwa Syarie Negeri Selangor v Khalid Bin Abdul Samad, [2019] 3 ShLR 39.
SM Faisal SM Nasimuddin v Maria Chin Abdullah, [2023] 7 MLJ 485.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Shariah Law Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





